🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our children's youth". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," commented the European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the regional government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that states around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.